First appeared in Detroit Free Press
Private investors and Indian tribes are proposing 22 new
casinos across lower Michigan, and metro Detroit is clearly among the targets
of the gambling gold rush.
Hopefuls are wagering -- against long odds -- on plans that
could make them millions of dollars while also nearly doubling the number of
casinos in the state. Six organizations want in on the game -- two investor
groups separately seeking state constitutional amendments and four tribes
trying to expand off-reservation gambling.
The proposals overlap, calling for four casinos in Romulus
and two more in Detroit, home to the state's only non-tribal casinos. The
groups also want casinos in Macomb and Oakland counties and two in Port Huron.
"It's like fantasy land," said Michigan State
University law professor Matthew Fletcher, who specializes in tribal law.
"I really don't expect people are willing to have that many more casinos
in lower Michigan."
Confidential documents reviewed by the Free Press reveal
details.
Leading one effort is Michigan First, which would amend the
state constitution and usher in the largest gambling expansion since Detroit's
casinos were approved in the 1990s.
In secret pitches to potential investors and government
officials, Michigan First organizers propose a new casino in Detroit, one each
in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties, and four more outstate, documents show.
In Macomb County, the group would build a $300-million casino projected to rake
in $85 million a year in profit for its owners once initial building costs are
paid off.
A competing proposal by a separate group called Michigan Is
Yours is also on the table, as are pitches from four tribes hoping to expand
gambling through off-reservation casinos such as one proposed a few blocks from
the state Capitol in Lansing.
Gov. Rick Snyder, Detroit's casinos and Mayor Dave Bing
oppose casino expansion. So do major outstate Indian tribes.
Despite those challenges, investors and other tribes want to
cash in, lured by the record $1.4 billion in revenues Detroit's casinos posted
in 2011 and what supporters view as untapped markets in cities across the Lower
Peninsula.
The fight may be costly. Michigan First tells potential
investors that before one brick can be laid it will have to raise nearly $50
million to collect enough signatures for its campaign and then woo voter
support for a November constitutional amendment to allow non-tribal casinos in
Michigan First's designated cities: four in the Detroit area and one each in
Grand Rapids, Lansing, Cadillac and the Flint-Bay City-Saginaw area.
Michigan First says in the documents that it has lined up
support from former Michigan House Speaker Rick Johnson, a Republican from the
Cadillac area, and Mitch Irwin, a Democrat who was the state's management and
budget director under former Gov. Jennifer Granholm.
Irwin confirmed his involvement but declined to discuss
details in the documents or specifics about the group's proposal, saying more
would be revealed in mid-March.
"We're not ready to announce anything publicly right
now," Irwin told the Free Press.
Irwin said the effort is attracting enormous interest among
community leaders and private investors.
Others associated with the Michigan First effort, including
Johnson, did not return phone calls seeking comment.
Opposition's
viewpoint
James Nye, a spokesman for a coalition of tribes and Detroit
casinos preparing to fight the Michigan First effort, said his group is ready
to raise $50 million to stop the new casinos. The group, Protect MI Vote, says
casino expansion would circumvent state voters' approval in 2004 of a
constitutional amendment requiring both statewide approval of non-tribal casino
expansion and approval of local voters where a casino would locate.
Nye's group represents the MGM Grand Detroit and Greektown
casinos and two tribes: the Saginaw Chippewa, which own Soaring Eagle in Mt.
Pleasant, and the Nottawaseppi Huron Band, which owns FireKeepers Casino near
Battle Creek. Nye said Michigan First wants to write its eight casinos into the
state constitution, exempting them from the strict Michigan regulatory
oversight required for the existing Detroit casinos.
"They are really unbelievably brazen with their plan to
sell off pieces of our constitution to their investors," Nye said.
"Worst of all, there is no transparency," he said, adding that it
remains possible for any amendment that goes before voters to not include the
names of the casino owners.
Other casino efforts
Separately, a high-profile effort to build a glitzy
$245-million Kewadin Lansing Casino, just blocks from the state Capitol, kicked
off in January. It would be built by the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa
Indians in partnership with the city, and would be the state's 26th casino.
Other efforts range from the small Upper Peninsula
Hannahville Indian Community's interest in building a casino in Romulus to
larger efforts by the two investor groups. One of the investor groups, Michigan
Is Yours, has tapped former Detroit Lions great Billy Sims as a backer and aims
to build privately owned casinos in Detroit, Romulus, Port Huron, Grand Rapids,
Lansing, Saginaw and Benton Harbor.
"Detroit was meant to be the first city, not the only
city," Sims told the Free Press.
How much is too much?
Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero said he's not sure, but it's time
that cities outside Detroit get a crack at the jobs and economic development
potential of casinos, instead of seeing the money flow to other parts of the
state.
"That's our money they're luring away," Bernero
said. "I want that money reinvested here. Lansing will get a casino. The
only question is when and where. I want it downtown as soon as possible."
But Michigan First and Michigan Is Yours also each want a
casino in Lansing -- that would make three -- and the overlap among the
competing plans highlights serious questions: Can Michigan's casino market
handle a slew of new casinos, and if so, how many?
In southeast Michigan, gamblers already can easily drive to
casinos in Detroit and Windsor. There will be one more option when the
Hollywood Casino Toledo opens in Ohio in late May.
Adding casinos in Detroit and its immediate suburbs and Port
Huron would saturate the market, said Frank Fantini, editor and publisher of
Fantini's Gaming & Lodging Reports. He said putting so many casinos in
metro Detroit would be "extreme, because you're not dealing with a
destination market."
Michigan now has 22 tribal casinos in addition to Detroit's
three, and analyst Jake Miklojcik said it's not likely that government
officials would permit the number to double -- or that banks would finance so
many new casinos.
He said, however, the Michigan market has room for more
casinos, perhaps a 20% expansion.
The American Gaming Association ranks Detroit the nation's
fifth biggest casino market. And it's a lucrative industry statewide, employing
about 19,800 people last year in Detroit and tribal casinos, by the state's
estimate.
Detroit's casinos in 2010 paid nearly $100 million to the
state's school aid fund and nearly $164 million in Detroit wagering taxes,
according to the Michigan Gaming Control Board. Tribal casinos paid more than
$61 million in taxes to the state and local governments in 2010.
"For any one community, it could be a nice shot in the
arm" to open a casino, Miklojcik said. "Could Flint have a successful
casino? Yes. Would it rely on pulling from other casinos? Probably."
Nye said that risk is too great.
"In Michigan, we are in a mature casino gaming
market," Nye said. "The pie is not going to grow any larger, so
instead, everyone will get a smaller piece of the pie, and in that scenario,
you would have a dramatic shift of jobs and revenue from certain areas of the
state to another, but without any net economic gain for the state."